Prince Harry's decision to attend King Charles' coronation on May 6th has ignited a fiery debate, with critics accusing him of attempting to undermine the Roar family.
The Duke of Sussex, aged 38, will be present at the event while his wife, Meghan Markle, remains in Montecito with their children, Lilibet and Archie.
The announcement of Harry's attendance has drawn sharp criticism from GB News host Dan Wooten, who vehemently opposed Charles extending an invitation to the royal residing in the United States.
During a recent segment called The Clash, Wooten engaged in a heated exchange with broadcaster Joanna Jouarck and royal expert Ingrid Seward.
Wooten expressed his disapproval of Harry's presence, citing past actions that he believes have harmed the Roar family.
In a tense moment, Wooten accused Harry of betraying his own family by divulging private conversations with his father shortly after Prince Philip's funeral.
The host questioned the prince's motives for trying to portray a facade of unity at the upcoming coronation despite causing turmoil within the royal household over the past seven months.
Jouarck raised a pertinent question about the media's fixation on Meghan Markle, emphasizing that much of the public discourse revolves around her.
She challenged the focus on Harry's attendance while redirecting attention to the impact Meghan's presence may have on the event.
Buckingham Palace recently confirmed Harry's participation in the coronation service at Westminster Abbey, marking his first official royal engagement following the publication of his memoir, “Spare.”
In the book, Harry made controversial statements about Camilla, the Queen Consort, and reflected on his father's perceived inadequacies as a parent.
A source close to Prince Charles expressed dismay over Harry's revelations in the memoir, describing the Prince of Wales as distressed and incensed by the damaging claims made by his son.
The source highlighted the strain Harry's words had placed on Charles' relationship with Camilla, further complicating an already delicate situation.
Author Andrew Lowney, known for his work on royal scandals, urged for Harry to be excluded from the coronation festivities, asserting that the prince's actions have tarnished the royal brand irreparably.
Lowney painted a grim picture of Harry's future within the monarchy, suggesting that severing ties might be the best course of action.
As opinions on Prince Harry's involvement in the coronation continue to diverge, the public remains divided on the implications of his past actions and their impact on the royal family's image.
The upcoming event promises to be a focal point for observers eager to witness the dynamics at play within the Roar family.
Share your thoughts on this unfolding saga in the comments section, and stay tuned for more updates on Royal News and Analysis.
Related Posts
- You’ve got to be kidding: Prince Harry’s Potential Move to Japan
- Why Meghan Markle and Prince Harry May Not Always Have Custody of Their Child
- Veterans Accuse Prince Harry and Meghan Markle of Betrayal
- Veteran Journalist Unleashes Scathing Critique on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
- Unveiling the Truth: Lady Colin Campbell’s Criticism Towards Prince Harry
