**
The ongoing debate regarding whether Harry and Meghan should retain their Duke and Duchess titles continues to capture public attention and spark discussions.
Conservative MP Bob Seeley's proposed bill, drawing on laws from World War I to potentially remove their titles, has stirred controversy and garnered support from those who view it as a necessary step.
Mr Seeley's frustration, particularly highlighted by the reference to Endgame as a pivotal moment, echoes a sentiment shared by individuals who believe that Harry and Meghan have been undermining the British government.
In his opinion piece in The Times, advocating for the couple to be referred to as Mr and Mrs Sussex like any other citizens, there is a clear call for equality in title holding.
The debate surrounding the couple's titles reflects the intricate dynamics between Harry, Meghan, and their royal connections, prompting questions about the appropriateness of their continued use of these prestigious titles.
The discontent towards Harry and Meghan has escalated following their withdrawal from official duties in 2020, with many perceiving a pattern of criticisms and revelations about the royal family.
Their choices in public statements and disclosures, deemed by some as unnecessary, have fueled resentment among certain segments of the British populace.
Calls on social media for the removal of their titles have gained traction, with many expressing frustration over what they perceive as the couple's exploitation of their royal ties.
The mention of the controversial interview marked a turning point for numerous individuals who previously held neutral or tolerant views towards Harry and Meghan.
However, the complexities surrounding the legal procedures for revoking titles, coupled with the historical context of their bestowment by Queen Elizabeth, have raised doubts about the feasibility of King Charles having the authority to strip them of their titles.
The ongoing discussions underscore the intricate relationship between the royal family, public opinion, and the privileges associated with royal titles.
Royal experts have expressed a consensus that King Charles is unlikely to revoke Harry and Meghan's titles, given their origin from Queen Elizabeth.
Despite criticisms of the couple's perceived lack of substantial work on behalf of the monarchy, there is a sense of reverence for the titles' origins.
Author Tom Quinn has cautioned against parliamentary bills aimed at removing their titles, warning that such actions could exacerbate an already challenging situation and provide Harry and Meghan with further grounds for complaint.
The complex interplay between the royal family, government, and public sentiment adds layers of complexity to any potential decisions concerning the couple's titles.
The comparison drawn between Harry and Meghan's situation and the historical precedence set by Edward VIII, who retained his title despite abdicating the throne, highlights the intricacies of the issue.
Both figures faced personal dilemmas involving American partners that led to significant repercussions within the royal family.
The reluctance to revoke titles, despite calls for their removal, underscores the delicate balance between tradition, respect for past decisions, and the evolving circumstances surrounding Harry and Meghan's actions.
While the debate rages on about the fate of Harry and Meghan's titles, the underlying concern remains the impact on the line of succession.
With Harry and his children still included in the line of succession, there are potential implications for the future of the British monarchy.
The decision to retain their titles, albeit as honorary and lacking political significance, raises questions about the broader implications for the royal family and the institution itself.
As discussions persist, the complexities surrounding the couple's titles and their place within the monarchy continue to evoke mixed reactions and uncertainties about the path forward.
