In a move that has raised eyebrows across the political spectrum, Georgia’s state election board convened this morning to revisit allegations of fraud from the 2020 election—claims that have long been debunked.
The board’s decision to reopen an investigation into supposed irregularities in Fulton County seems to reflect a deeper agenda, one that aligns closely with pro-Trump narratives rather than the facts on the ground.
Justin Glaw, the author of the American Doom newsletter, joined us for insights on this latest development.
He pointed out that the ongoing narrative from Republican leaders often emphasizes looking forward, yet their actions tell a different story.
Instead of moving on from the past, they are actively seeking to reexamine events that have already been thoroughly litigated and disproven.
The board’s recent actions seem to be more about appeasing Trump loyalists than uncovering any real evidence of wrongdoing.
During a recent visit to Georgia, Trump specifically mentioned several individuals who are now part of this investigation, suggesting that their efforts are not just bureaucratic but politically motivated.
Glaw elaborated on the dual motivations behind this reinvestigation.
On one hand, there are those who genuinely believe they might find hidden evidence of electoral fraud.
On the other, there are those who understand that perpetuating the narrative of a stolen election keeps their base engaged and energized as the next election approaches.
It’s puzzling, though, how the board expects to substantiate claims of fraud when countless recounts and audits have already confirmed Biden’s victory in Georgia.
The specific focus of this renewed inquiry appears to be on double-counted ballots—issues that have already been addressed and shown to reinforce the legitimacy of the election results.
As Glaw noted, there are two possible interpretations of this investigation.
One is that these officials might actually believe in the existence of a grand conspiracy to steal the election.
The other is more cynical: they may simply be using this narrative to keep their supporters fired up, even if they don’t truly believe in it themselves.
What happens when the results of this investigation inevitably confirm what we already know?
Glaw suggests that there’s a strong possibility that the board will simply ignore the findings, much like how other election denial efforts have played out in various states.
The cycle of denial could continue, allowing them to claim victimhood against a biased system.
The Georgia state election board even hinted at filing subpoenas against Fulton County, raising questions about their legal authority to do so.
This maneuver could be less about finding truth and more about creating a smokescreen for their ongoing claims of fraud, effectively preserving their narrative regardless of the evidence.
This situation echoes similar election denialism tactics seen nationwide, where the goal seems less about uncovering truth and more about maintaining a perception of widespread fraud.
It creates a scenario where officials can always point to a lack of cooperation or alleged bias as justification for their continued claims.
Meanwhile, the looming question remains about the new rule mandating hand counting of all ballots in the upcoming 2024 election.
This controversial measure has sparked litigation, not from the state’s own officials, but from Democratic groups concerned about its implications for fair voting practices.
Glaw pointed out that this hand counting process is not as straightforward as it sounds.
It involves aligning the number of ballots collected with the number of voters checked in, which could lead to discrepancies—especially in high-traffic polling locations.
Critics argue that this opens the door to potential manipulation and further undermines confidence in the electoral process.
As the political landscape heats up ahead of the 2024 elections, the actions of the Georgia state election board serve as a reminder of the lengths to which some will go to uphold their narratives.
With the implications of these investigations and rules still unfolding, the conversation around election integrity continues to evolve.
For those interested in following Glaw’s insightful coverage on this topic, he writes extensively in his newsletter, American Doom, available on Substack.
His work sheds light on the complexities of election integrity issues, particularly in the context of Georgia, a battleground state critical to future elections.
