Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Hollywood news

Why Meghan Markle and Prince Harry May Not Always Have Custody of Their Child

When it was announced in October that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were expecting their first child, the news was met with excitement from the couple and their relatives.

However, there is an intriguing law in place that suggests and Meghan may not always have full legal custody of their child.

This law dates back over three centuries and grants the sovereign full legal custody of their minor grandchildren.

Royal expert Marlene Koenig explains that the law, known as “The Grand Opinion for the Prerogative Concerning the ,” was introduced by King George I in 1717.

According to Koenig, this law originated from a disagreement between George I and his son, the future George II.

It is believed that George II did not want the godparent chosen by his father for his son, leading George I to seek a solution through Parliament.

As a result of this law, when Charles, Prince of Wales becomes sovereign, he will have custody of his minor grandchildren.

The issue surrounding this law came to light in 1994 when Princess Diana separated from .

Diana had expressed a desire to take their sons, Harry and William, to live with her in Australia, but was unable to do so due to the custody regulations imposed by the law.

An annual register published in 1772 provides further details on the ruling and confirms the legality of this prerogative.

It states that the King has the right to care for the marriage and education of the children of the , including the presumptive heir to the crown.

Although the law technically gives II custody of her minor grandchildren, Koenig believes that she would never feel the need to exercise this right.

She views it more as a formality, as the Queen has allowed her children to raise their own kids.

In recent years, there have been efforts to challenge laws that favor male inheritance of hereditary peerages.

If such a change were to occur, it would mean that a daughter born to and Meghan would inherit a royal title, which was previously not possible.

Under the current system, any child of the Duke and Duchess would not automatically receive a royal title.

The title of Sussex could potentially die out if they were to have only daughters, as it did in the past.

It is important to note that the law discussed here refers to custody of minor grandchildren, not great-grandchildren.

Also read this:

Hollywood news

Actress Demi Moore, known for her age-defying looks, made headlines recently, but this time it wasn't for her youthful appearance. During Paris Fashion Week,...

Hollywood news

In the world of Hollywood, certain moments on set become legendary. One such incident occurred during the filming of “The Wolf of Wall Street,”...

Hollywood news

Cybill Shepherd, the stunning actress known for her breakthrough roles in the early 1970s, celebrates her 73rd birthday tomorrow. Despite the passing years, she...

Hollywood news

In a stunning revelation, Natalie Wood's sister, Lana Wood, claims in her forthcoming memoir that the late actress was s**ually assaulted by Hollywood star...

Hollywood news

Mel Gibson, the renowned actor known for his roles in movies like Lethal Weapon and Braveheart, recently revealed that the directors of his upcoming...

Hollywood news

Russell Crowe, the 52-year-old actor, has responded to body shamers on Twitter with a witty comeback. Recently, pictures of Crowe emerged from Sydney, Australia,...

Hollywood news

Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy, the iconic duo who starred in nine films together, have long been celebrated for their on-screen chemistry and rumored...