Royal correspondent Neil Sean recently shared insights on the disappointment felt by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle due to the lack of support from celebrities amidst ongoing controversies.
The couple, often referred to as the Harkles, found themselves in a situation where even close allies like Meghan's mother Doria Ragland, Marcus, Scooby, and their favored tabloids remained conspicuously silent.
Despite the deafening silence from the monarchy regarding the near-catastrophic car chase involving Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, speculations abound on what the royals might be thinking about the unfolding drama.
A purported friend of Prince William shed light on the matter during a recent interview, highlighting how the Sussexes' public outing in New York City on May 16 contradicted their supposed desire for privacy.
Expressing confusion over Prince Harry's continued attendance at high-profile events despite his aversion to media attention, the insider questioned the logic behind such actions.
Moreover, the mention of the prince's past traumas and comparisons to his late mother, Princess Diana, only added fuel to the ongoing debate.
In response to queries about whether the Prince of Wales would come to his brother's defense, the insider hinted at the complexities within the royal family dynamics.
While acknowledging Prince Charles' empathy towards Harry's struggles with paparazzi intrusion, the source emphasized the futility of complaining about media scrutiny, echoing sentiments of futility in such situations.
Bethenny Frankel, a familiar face from “The Real Housewives of New York City,” did not hold back in sharing her perspective on the matter.
Taking to Instagram, she criticized Harry and Meghan's handling of the paparazzi incident, suggesting alternative approaches to defuse such situations.
Frankel's candid remarks reflected a broader sentiment of skepticism towards the couple's decisions post-royal life transition.
Questioning the motives behind Harry and Meghan's pursuit of the photo agency for footage retrieval, Frankel urged the couple to reassess their strategies.
Drawing parallels to iconic celebrities who navigate fame without similar controversies, she underscored the need for better management of media relations to avoid escalating tensions needlessly.
Frankel's analogy likening the couple's predicament to a perilous swim between Cuba and Florida resonated with concerns over the direction of Harry and Meghan's public image.
Her call for a strategic retreat and recalibration of their approach highlighted the importance of making informed choices in the face of intense scrutiny.
Highlighting the impracticality of seeking anonymity while navigating public spaces, Frankel advised Harry and Meghan to consider alternative solutions when faced with intrusive paparazzi pursuits.
Her blunt assessment of the situation underscored the challenges inherent in balancing personal privacy with public visibility in the digital age.
In a final plea for restraint and prudence, Frankel urged the couple to pause, reflect, and reassess their strategies to avoid further entanglements with the media.
By advocating for a more measured response to external pressures, she echoed a sentiment of caution and deliberation in managing the complexities of public life post-royalty.
