Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, reportedly had her first husband, Trevor Engelson, agree to a pregnancy contract to ensure she had all the luxuries possible if they were to have a child together.
The revelation was made by a close friend who was once acquainted with Markle.
The couple tied the knot in a picturesque beachfront ceremony in Jamaica back in September 2011, just as Meghan's television career was taking off with the premiere of the legal drama series, Suits.
According to the friend, Meghan expressed concerns about regaining her pre-pregnancy physique after giving birth, especially with her career gaining momentum.
She wanted to ensure she had the necessary support, including a personal trainer and nutritionist, to help her maintain her health and figure during and after the pregnancy.
The friend disclosed that Meghan's focus was primarily on her well-being and weight management, given her family history of struggling with weight-related issues.
The informal pregnancy contract was brought up when the couple was contemplating starting a family in the near future.
It was a document that Meghan wanted Engelson to sign voluntarily, without the involvement of any legal professionals.
The friend revealed that Engelson felt compelled to agree to Meghan's terms, understanding her concerns about body image and insecurities.
He acquiesced to signing the document, which might have been a handwritten agreement that served as a reminder of their understanding.
Fast forward to the present day, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have attracted curiosity and confusion from their American fans regarding their decision to keep their children, Archie and Lilibet, out of the public eye.
Since the birth of their children, the couple has maintained a low profile with limited public appearances of their offspring, leaving royal enthusiasts, especially in the US, puzzled about the reasoning behind their choice.
During a recent episode of Royally Us, host Christina Garibaldi acknowledged the couple's desire for privacy and protection of their children but questioned whether a glimpse into their family life would be appreciated by their followers.
PR expert Citrion weighed in on the debate, emphasizing the delicate balance between authenticity and transparency in the public eye.
While advocating for boundaries and selective disclosure of personal matters, Citrion highlighted the American cultural norm of sharing family moments on social media, contrasting it with the couple's approach to shielding their children from the spotlight.
In navigating the complexities of fame and parenthood, Meghan and Harry face the challenge of balancing their desire for privacy with the public's curiosity about their family life.
While maintaining boundaries is crucial, finding the right balance between openness and safeguarding their children's privacy remains a delicate tightrope walk for the royal couple.
As they continue to navigate their roles in the public eye, Meghan and Harry's decisions regarding their children's visibility will undoubtedly spark ongoing discussions among royal enthusiasts and media observers alike.
Related Posts
- Ziggy Marley Confronts Meghan Markle at Bob Marley Movie Premiere
- Zendaya Shines at Green Carpet Fashion Awards Amidst Meghan Markle’s Controversial Intrusion
- Why Meghan Markle and Prince Harry May Not Always Have Custody of Their Child
- Veterans Accuse Prince Harry and Meghan Markle of Betrayal
- Veteran Journalist Unleashes Scathing Critique on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle