A recent revelation has shed light on Omid Scobie's discreet departure from the UK to Los Angeles.
Speculations arose as Harry and Meghan reportedly met with him at various hotels in LA to avoid leaving any electronic traces.
The situation took a twist when the Dutch edition of Scobie's latest book, “Endgame,” disclosed the identities of two senior royals allegedly involved in a heated dispute.
Scobie, however, maintains that he never implicated any royal figures in the controversy.
Amidst the resurfacing royal feud, Meghan Markle was captured on camera sporting a smile, yet possibly concealing underlying tension, as analyzed by a body language expert.
Despite Meghan's seemingly carefree demeanor while donning a black top, leggings, and a green baseball cap, Judy James, the body language specialist, noted subtle signs of stress in her facial muscles.
James suggested that the visible tension around Meghan's jaw, chin, and neck could indicate efforts to portray resilience amidst the turmoil.
Recent reports from an undisclosed source have disclosed Omid Scobie's swift retreat to Los Angeles.
Allegedly, Harry and Meghan strategically met with Scobie in person at various LA hotels during the writing of “Endgame” to evade leaving a digital trail, following revelations of their collaboration through emails.
The source insinuated that Meghan orchestrated these clandestine meetings out of envy and vindictiveness, branding her as cunning and manipulative.
However, with her exposure, her schemes seem to have reached a dead-end.
In the midst of the ongoing saga, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle face diminishing influence sans their royal titles, amidst the escalating tensions within the monarchy.
Katie Nicholl, in a statement to GB News, highlighted the couple's estrangement from the royal family in all but name.
Drawing parallels to Princess Diana's title revocation for lesser offenses, Nicholl emphasized the potential repercussions for Harry and Meghan.
The discussion also touched upon the possibility of parliamentary intervention in stripping the titles, underscoring the pivotal role these titles play in the couple's public image.
When probed about the anticipated response to “Endgame” and the silence surrounding the royal controversy, Nicholl anticipated a conspicuous absence of comments from the Sussex camp.
Citing past practices, Nicholl suggested that the palace typically refrains from immediate reactions to controversial publications to allow the situation to settle naturally.
Webster echoed the sentiment, highlighting the risk of inflaming the situation by engaging prematurely.
The prevailing consensus seemed to be a cautious approach to let the storm pass without adding fuel to the fire.
