The recent debut of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's Netflix documentary series has stirred up a storm of controversy, leaving the UK newspaper front pages ablaze with outrage and dismay.
Critics have not held back in expressing their disapproval of the tell-all production, with some going as far as to label it a direct assault on the legacy of the late Queen.
One Palace Insider, in a candid review of the Harry and Meghan documentary alongside TV critic Lucy Mangan, expressed profound disgust, stating that watching the series was so nauseating that it nearly ruined their morning meal.
The Daily Mail spared no punches in its critique, accusing the royal couple of harboring intentions to dismantle the monarchy and portraying the expose as a direct attack on the Queen's memory.
Following suit, The Telegraph echoed similar sentiments, denouncing the show as a blow to the late Queen's legacy by likening the Commonwealth to a revamped version of the British Empire.
Royal sources quoted in The Times vehemently refuted these claims, describing the portrayal as both offensive and factually incorrect, particularly in its depiction of the Queen's involvement with the Commonwealth.
Amidst the uproar, the country's High Commissioner to the UK, Aikatu Seni-Auduv, condemned what was perceived as condescending remarks regarding the Commonwealth, emphasizing that such comments undermined the agency's autonomy and the sovereignty of its member nations.
The decision to feature footage of the Queen in a critical light within the documentary further fueled tensions, drawing sharp rebukes from within the royal household and the Commonwealth headquarters in London.
Critics within the documentary, such as writer Afua Hirsch and academic Kehinde Andrews, did not hold back in their scathing assessments of the Commonwealth, branding it as a continuation of colonial imperialism.
Professor Andrews, known for his previous accusations of racism within the royal family, highlighted persistent inequalities within the Commonwealth, suggesting that little progress had been made in improving the conditions of its black populations.
The decision by Harry and Meghan to spotlight British critics of the monarchy and the Commonwealth drew sharp criticism from Commonwealth officials, who questioned the couple's motives in aligning with voices that were openly critical of the institution.
The Queen's Commonwealth Trust, which once counted the Sussexes among its esteemed leadership, has since distanced itself from the pair, signaling a growing rift between the royal couple and established Commonwealth entities.
As reactions continue to pour in, the public is left to ponder the implications of Harry and Meghan's actions in the context of the broader royal narrative.
Are the Sussexes overstepping boundaries by invoking the late Queen's legacy for their own ends, or are they shedding much-needed light on longstanding issues within the Commonwealth?
Share your thoughts below and stay tuned for further updates on this unfolding saga.
Remember, for more exclusive royal insights like this, don't forget to hit that subscribe button and stay informed.
Thank you for joining us in this riveting exploration of the latest royal developments.
