The christening of the Sussexes' daughter, Lily, has left many scratching their heads as details emerge about the unconventional event.
Speculations abound as to why the ceremony seemed to lack the usual pomp and circumstance associated with royal baptisms.
Was it a simple oversight, a deliberate choice, or perhaps a strategic move on the part of Meghan and Harry?
The news of Lily's official christening as Princess Lily Bet came as a surprise to many, not only for the title bestowed upon her but also for the way in which the information was revealed.
Instead of the customary announcement from the palace, the news broke through an unexpected source – People magazine.
This departure from tradition raised eyebrows and sparked confusion among royal reporters and observers alike.
While a royal source assured that discussions had taken place between the palace and Montecito prior to the announcement, the lack of a formal statement from Buckingham Palace added to the air of mystery surrounding the event.
Questions lingered about the absence of familiar royal customs, such as the use of traditional baptismal items like the christening gown and holy water from the Jordan River.
The timing of Lily's christening also raised eyebrows, as it occurred when she was just a few months old, unlike her brother Archie who was baptized at around two months of age.
The decision to delay the ceremony prompted speculation about Meghan and Harry's motives and whether it was a calculated move to divert attention from recent controversies surrounding the couple.
Critics have pointed out the apparent hypocrisy in Meghan and Harry's actions, given their public criticisms of the monarchy and claims of mistreatment.
The couple's decision to bestow royal titles upon their children seems at odds with their previous statements about wanting to break away from the constraints of royal life and provide their offspring with a more normal upbringing.
In contrast, other members of the royal family, such as Prince Edward and his wife Sophie, have opted for a different approach by allowing their children to decide whether to use their royal titles when they come of age.
This contrasts with Meghan and Harry's decision to immediately embrace the titles for their children, raising questions about their true intentions and beliefs regarding the monarchy.
As the debate over Meghan and Harry's choices continues, one cannot ignore the significance of Lily's namesake connection to Queen Elizabeth II, whose passing six months ago coincided with the christening.
The omission of any reference to the late queen in the christening announcement adds another layer of intrigue to an already complex situation.
Ultimately, the unconventional christening of Lily has reignited discussions about Meghan and Harry's relationship with the royal family and their perceived motivations.
Whether this move was a strategic PR maneuver or a genuine expression of their beliefs remains open to interpretation.
As the saga unfolds, one thing is certain – the Sussexes' actions continue to spark debate and speculation among royal watchers and critics alike.
What are your thoughts on Meghan and Harry's decision to christen Lily as Princess Lily Bet?
Share your opinions below and join the conversation on this intriguing royal development.
Stay tuned for more updates as the story unfolds.
