A campaign to abolish the Sussex titles gains momentum as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle find themselves in a precarious position.
Despite Prince Harry's assurance that losing their titles would not affect them, a Member of Parliament is now pushing for changes to the rules governing peerages.
The release of Prince Harry's biography seems to have inadvertently fueled the movement to strip them of their Sussex titles, according to a Royal Analyst.
Conservative MP Bob Seeley has proposed amending the 1917 Titles Deprivation Act in order to remove the Duke and Duchess of Sussex from their titles.
Jonathan Sasserdoti noted that Seeley was motivated by Prince Harry's autobiography when considering this course of action.
The Netflix series also played a role in prompting Seeley to take steps towards stripping the couple of their titles.
The revelations in Prince Harry's book have stirred controversy and criticism, with many feeling that it portrayed the royal family and monarchy in a negative light.
This departure from traditional royal behavior has led to a decline in Prince Harry's popularity and raised questions about his entitlement to retain his title, as highlighted by Sasserdoti during an interview with Fox Digital.
Seeley's plan involves introducing a private members' bill to modify the 1917 Titles Deprivation Act, which was previously used to revoke titles from the German royal family during World War I.
It is unprecedented for a sitting MP to advocate for the removal of royal titles, reflecting the seriousness of the situation surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
Historically, royal titles were stripped only in cases where individuals were convicted of crimes or acted against the interests of the United Kingdom.
The act was originally enacted during World War I, with Prince Harry's great-grandfather, George V, utilizing it to deprive certain family members of their titles for supporting the German army.
Seeley's move to potentially strip Prince Harry and Meghan of their titles signifies a significant political statement.
He criticizes Prince Harry for his actions, accusing him of undermining key institutions in the country, betraying his family, and capitalizing on personal hardships.
Prince Harry could preemptively renounce his titles to avoid the embarrassment of having them forcibly removed, a move reminiscent of past royal figures like Princess Patricia of Connaught.
Even if Prince Harry were to relinquish his Ducal titles, he would still retain his status as a Prince of the United Kingdom.
This distinction is crucial as it impacts Meghan's title usage, allowing her to be referred to as the Princess Henry.
Princess Michael of Kent remains the only royal family member who continues to employ this convention due to her husband's lack of a royal peerage.
Amidst this turmoil, a poignant letter from the Queen surfaces, revealing her profound grief over the loss of her father, King George VI.
While the Queen has maintained a composed exterior in public, she confided in a trusted former courtier about the depth of her sorrow, highlighting the emotional toll of recent events on the royal family.
Related Posts
- You’ve got to be kidding: Prince Harry’s Potential Move to Japan
- Why Meghan Markle and Prince Harry May Not Always Have Custody of Their Child
- Veterans Accuse Prince Harry and Meghan Markle of Betrayal
- Veteran Journalist Unleashes Scathing Critique on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
- Unveiling the Truth: Lady Colin Campbell’s Criticism Towards Prince Harry