Sussex is reeling in shock as the U.S. Amendment Constitution throws a wrench into Lily's chances of claiming the princess title.
The latest bombshell involves the Harkles dubbing their own offspring prince and princess, despite allegedly extending an invitation to the King and Prince of Wales for a christening at their residence, rather than Meghan's estranged father and relatives, alongside Tyler Perry.
However, the royal invitees were notably absent from the event.
Adding fuel to the fire, Ngozi Fulani has come forward on the same day, asserting possession of a recording of the incident and demanding a public apology from the British Royal Family.
The controversial move by the Harkles raises concerns about subjecting their children to potential bullying, mockery, and embarrassment.
With both kids holding American citizenship, their parents have seemingly ensured that any genuine connection with the active members of the British monarchy remains out of reach.
The insistence on bestowing titles upon their offspring begs the question: who exactly is meant to be impressed by these designations?
While some Americans may find the titles appealing, a significant portion likely remains indifferent.
The Harkles' push for recognition through such titles, whether within their household or among their staff, appears to be a desperate plea for attention.
Quoting Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution, the prohibition on titles of nobility underscores the nation's rejection of aristocratic privileges and aligns with the republican principles enshrined in the Constitution.
This constitutional provision complements other amendments aimed at eradicating discriminatory distinctions among American citizens, emphasizing equality and merit over inherited status.
For individuals raising children as U.S. citizens, such as the Sussexes, the utilization of royal titles to assert entitlements appears to contradict the principles of American governance.
The call to relinquish these titles extends not only to the children but also to the parents themselves.
Any insistence on retaining noble designations within the U.S. jurisdiction could potentially infringe upon the constitutional rights of citizens.
In a bold move, the Sussexes have taken a stand against traditional royal conventions by opting for unconventional names for their children.
Embracing a departure from customary regal associations, they aim to position themselves as progressive and forward-thinking individuals challenging outdated norms.
Their choice to forego titles reflects a desire for their children to forge their paths free from the constraints of historical hierarchies.
By rejecting the trappings of royalty and seeking to redefine their family's narrative, the Sussexes are making a statement about their values and aspirations.
Their decision to break away from established traditions and expectations underscores a commitment to charting a distinct course, one that prioritizes individuality and autonomy over conformity to historical precedents.
As the royal saga unfolds, the Sussexes' actions continue to spark debate and controversy, with critics questioning the motivations behind their choices.
Whether viewed as a bold assertion of independence or a misguided departure from tradition, the couple's decisions have thrust them into the spotlight, inviting scrutiny and speculation from both supporters and detractors.
In a landscape where tradition clashes with innovation, the Sussexes navigate a complex terrain of identity and legacy, seeking to carve out a unique path for themselves and their children.
As they grapple with the implications of their choices and the scrutiny of public opinion, the couple remains steadfast in their commitment to redefining what it means to be royal in a rapidly evolving world.
