The rift between Prince Harry and the royal family seems to have deepened as King Charles has reportedly instructed Harry and Meghan to permanently leave Frogmore Cottage in Windsor.
This decision signifies a significant low point in their already strained relationship.
Discussions regarding the future of the property had been ongoing, but the monarch's final call to sell it came after Harry's revealing memoir, “Spare,” which may have displeased the king with its negative portrayal of the royal family.
Sources close to the couple revealed that Harry and Meghan were taken aback by the king's directive, especially since Frogmore Cottage was considered their safe haven in the UK.
During their recent visit for the Queen's Platinum Jubilee celebrations, the family opted to stay within the confines of the Windsor estate due to the lack of police protection, a matter that is now before the high court.
By stripping Harry of his only retreat in the country, King Charles is essentially conveying that his son is no longer welcome.
If the Sussexes plan to return for holidays or royal events, they will need to find alternative accommodations.
Options may include staying with Princess Eugenie or Princess Beatrice, their cousins with whom they share a close bond, or booking a luxury hotel in London.
However, given their strong desire for privacy, the latter choice seems less likely.
The clock is ticking for Harry and Meghan to vacate Frogmore Cottage, with reports suggesting they must do so by early summer.
The upcoming coronation in May could serve as an opportune moment for them to sort out their arrangements.
Despite the king's desire for Harry to attend the historic event, the decision regarding Frogmore Cottage signals a definitive end to Harry's ties with the royal family, indicating reconciliation is not on the horizon.
The heart of the matter lies in a father's frustration over his son's continuous criticism of the institution he leads and personal attacks on family members.
The situation appears to be more dire than anticipated, especially considering Harry and Meghan's lack of a permanent residence in the UK, making a swift return unlikely.
In other news, tensions are rising as a DUP MP hints at rejecting the Brexit deal, putting Chancellor Rishi Sunak on high alert for a potential revolt.
Criticism over the government's use of the monarchy to endorse its Northern Ireland strategy continues to mount.
Sammy Wilson of the Democratic Unionist Party has strongly suggested that his party may oppose Sunak's framework for Northern Ireland, citing concerns over the politicization of the monarchy.
The decision to involve the king in supporting the deal has sparked backlash from various quarters, including Tory lawmakers and prominent figures like Nigel Farage.
The move to hold crucial negotiations at Windsor Castle has also drawn criticism.
Mr. Wilson, along with other Northern Ireland unionists, including Dame Arlene Foster, have voiced apprehensions about the implications of intertwining the monarchy with political decisions.
Mr. Wilson emphasized the risks associated with leveraging the monarchy in such a manner, cautioning against using the royal family as a bargaining chip.
The government's attempt to sway unionists by invoking respect for the monarchy may not yield the desired outcome.
The ongoing discontent underscores the delicate balance between politics and monarchy, with the repercussions of this approach yet to fully unfold.
